Abstract Objective: The aim was to adapt an instrument that evaluates the relationship between young individuals and health professionals to the Brazilian population, which will be called the Escala de Avaliação de Vínculo entre Jovens e Profissionais de Saúde (Youth Connectedness to Provider scale). Method: The questionnaire known as the Youth Connectedness to Provider scale consists of seven Likert-like questions. The translation, back-translation, evaluation by ten specialists, and pre-test with 43 adolescents and young adults aged between 10 and 24 years were performed to assess the clarity and reliability of meanings. The content validity index was calculated for each question. Subsequently, the clinical validation was performed with 83 patients aged 10-24 years old and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated. Results: A content validity index >0.8 (considered satisfactory) was obtained for all items analyzed by experts and adolescents. At the clinical validation, it showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.76). The questions showed a good correlation, except for the question about judgment (Spearman’s rho = 0.03-0.19). Conclusions: The scale adaptation showed an adequate agreement rate at the translation evaluation and a good reliability index in the questions. This instrument provides information on strengths and topics that require more attention from professionals to improve the relationship with their patients; it can be a valuable parameter in assessing the medical consultation quality.

Resumo Introdução A avaliação da satisfação do usuário nos serviços de saúde mental é um importante indicador da qualidade do tratamento. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a satisfação com o tratamento em uma amostra de pacientes internados com transtornos mentais e as associações entre os níveis de satisfação e variáveis clínicas/sociodemográficas. Métodos Este estudo exploratório investigou 227 pacientes psiquiátricos internados que responderam a Escala de Satisfação do Paciente com os Serviços de Saúde Mental (SATIS-BR) e a Escala de Percepção da Mudança (EMP). Os escores SATIS-BR foram analisados segundo associações com dados clínicos e sociodemográficos. Correlações de Pearson foram usadas para correlacionar escores SATIS com outras variáveis. Resultados Encontramos alto grau de satisfação com o atendimento na unidade de internação psiquiátrica avaliada. Em geral, os pacientes atribuíram satisfação máxima para a maioria dos itens. Os maiores escores de satisfação foram associados a pacientes em tratamento pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e com menor escolaridade. A SATIS mostrou uma correlação positiva moderada com EMP. A pior dimensão avaliada foi associada às instalações físicas e conforto da enfermaria. Conclusão Pacientes com cobertura pelo SUS podem estar mais satisfeitos do que pacientes com planos privados de saúde quando tratados na mesma unidade. A avaliação da satisfação com o tratamento pode ser usada para reorganizar serviços em unidades de internação psiquiátrica.

Abstract Introduction User satisfaction assessment in mental health services is an important indicator of treatment quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate treatment satisfaction in a sample of inpatients with mental disorders and the associations between levels of satisfaction and clinical/sociodemographic variables. Methods This exploratory study investigated 227 psychiatric inpatients who answered the Patient Satisfaction with Mental Health Services Scale (SATIS-BR) and the Perception of Change Scale (EMP). SATIS scores were analyzed according to associations with clinical and sociodemographic data. Pearson correlations were used to correlate SATIS scores with other variables. Results We found a high degree of satisfaction with care at the psychiatric inpatient unit assessed. In general, patients rated maximum satisfaction for most items. The highest satisfaction scores were associated with patients receiving treatment through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) and with less education. SATIS showed a moderate positive correlation with EMP. The worst evaluated dimension was physical facilities and comfort of the ward. Conclusion Patients treated via SUS may be more satisfied than patients with private health insurance when treated in the same facility. The evaluation of treatment satisfaction can be used to reorganize services at psychiatric inpatient units.

Resumo Introdução: A avaliação dos resultados do tratamento para transtornos mentais torna-se mais completa quando a perspectiva do paciente é incluída. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar as propriedades psicométricas e a aplicação da Escala de Mudança Percebida - Versão do Paciente (EMP-P) em uma amostra de pacientes internados com transtornos mentais. Métodos: Um total de 191 pacientes psiquiátricos internados responderam a EMP-P e a Escala de Avaliação da Satisfação dos Usuários com os Serviços de Saúde Mental (SATIS), além de serem avaliados quanto a dados clínicos e sociodemográficos. Foi realizada análise fatorial exploratória (AFE) e calculada a consistência interna. As impressões clínicas do paciente, da família e do médico foram correlacionadas com a mudança percebida pelo paciente. Resultados: A AFE indicou uma solução de quatro fatores psicometricamente adequada. A EMP-P apresentou uma relação coerente com a SATIS e um alfa de Cronbach de 0,856. Não foi encontrada correlação entre impressão clínica global de melhora pelo médico e mudança percebida pelo paciente, embora uma correlação positiva moderada tenha sido observada entre impressão clínica global de melhora pelo paciente e mudança percebida pelo paciente. Conclusão: A EMP-P exibiu propriedades psicométricas adequadas em uma amostra de pacientes com transtornos mentais internados. A percepção de mudança pelo paciente é uma importante dimensão para a avaliação de resultados no tratamento de transtornos mentais e difere da impressão clínica de melhora do médico. A avaliação das percepções positivas e negativas das diversas dimensões da vida dos pacientes permite uma análise mais precisa de suas prioridades e interesses.

Abstract Introduction: Assessment of the results of treatment for mental disorders becomes more complete when the patient's perspective is incorporated. Here, we aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and application of the Perceived Change Scale - Patient version (PCS-P) in a sample of inpatients with mental disorders. Methods: One hundred and ninety-one psychiatric inpatients answered the PCS-P and the Patients' Satisfaction with Mental Health Services Scale (SATIS) and were evaluated in terms of clinical and sociodemographic data. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed and internal consistency was calculated. The clinical impressions of the patient, family, and physician were correlated with the patient's perception of change. Results: The EFA indicated a psychometrically suitable four-factor solution. The PCS-P exhibited a coherent relationship with SATIS and had a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.856. No correlations were found between the physician's clinical global impression of improvement and the patient's perception of change, although a moderate positive correlation was found between the patients' clinical global impression of improvement and the change perceived by the patient. Conclusions: The PCS-P exhibited adequate psychometric proprieties in a sample of inpatients with mental disorders. The patient's perception of change is an important dimension for evaluation of outcomes in the treatment of mental disorders and differs from the physician's clinical impression of improvement. Evaluation of positive and negative perceptions of the various dimensions of the patient's life enables more precise consideration of the patient's priorities and interests.

Background General Hospital Psychiatric Units have a fundamental importance in the mental health care systems. However, there is a lack of studies regarding the level of improvement of patients in this type of facility. Objective To assess factors related to good and poor outcomes in psychiatric inpatients using an index composed by clinical parameters easily measured. Methods Length of stay (LOS), Global Assessment of Functioning (variation and at discharge) and Clinical Global Impression (severity and improvement) were used to build a ten-point improvement index (I-Index). Records of psychiatric inpatients of a general hospital during an 18-month period were analyzed. Three groups (poor, intermediate and good outcomes) were compared by univariate and multivariate models according to clinical and sociodemographic variables. Results Two hundred and fifty patients were included, with a percentage in the groups with poor, regular and good outcomes of 16.4%, 59,6% and 24.0% respectively. Poor outcome at the discharge was associated mainly with lower education, transient disability, antipsychotics use, chief complaint “behavioral change/aggressiveness” and psychotic features. Multivariate analysis found a higher OR for diagnoses of “psychotic disorders” and “personality disorders” and others variables in relation to protective categories in the poor outcome group compared to the good outcome group. Discussion Our I-Index proved to be an indicator of that allows an easy and more comprehensive evaluation to assess outcomes of inpatients than just LOS. Different interventions addressed to conditions such as psychotic disorders and disruptive chief complaints are necessary.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Reconstruction of complex facial defects is a challenge for surgeons. After the excision of a lesion, nasal reconstruction is challenging because of the variety of tissues involved and the reduced local donor area for reconstruction. On the other hand, a major difficulty in the reconstruction of lip lesions is restoration of function, with the priority being the maintenance of the integrity of the sphincter structure, oral continence, mouth opening, and sensitivity. Among the alternatives for the reconstruction of these areas are local flaps, including the nasolabial flap. Aim: To analyze the outcome of nasal and upper lip reconstruction performed in two surgical stages, by using a nasolabial flap for complex defects resulting from the resection of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Case report: A 56-year-old female patient presented with advanced SCC in the nasal region of the columella, anterior third of the septum, and part of the upper lip. She underwent reconstruction with a nasolabial flap and, in a second surgical procedure, with a costal cartilage graft for the reconstruction of the columella. The procedures resulted in good integration and viability of grafts and flaps. The aesthetic result was satisfactory. Conclusion: The use of a nasolabial flap as a therapeutic option for the partial reconstruction of the nose and upper lip produces favorable functional and aesthetic outcomes. In addition, the division of the surgical procedure into stages provides safety in the use of local flaps, particularly in patients with poor healing.

RESUMO Introdução: Reconstruções de defeitos complexos na face constituem um desafio para os cirurgiões. Após ressecção da lesão, o reparo nasal é difícil, já que possui uma variedade de tecidos e área local doadora reduzida para reconstrução. Já as lesões de lábio possuem como principal dificuldade a restauração da função, priorizando a integridade da estrutura esfincteriana, a continência oral, a abertura bucal e a sensibilidade. Entre as alternativas para reconstrução dessas áreas, podemos optar por retalhos locais, entre os quais o nasogeniano. Objetivo: Analisar desfechos de reconstrução nasal e de lábio superior em dois tempos cirúrgicos, utilizando retalho nasogeniano, após defeito complexo causado por ressecção de carcinoma espinocelular (CEC). Relato do caso: Paciente do gênero feminino, 56 anos, apresentou CEC de progressão avançada em região nasal da columela, terço anterior do septo e parte do lábio superior. A paciente foi submetida à reconstrução com retalho nasogeniano e, em segundo momento cirúrgico, ao enxerto de cartilagem costal para reconstrução de columela. Apresenta evolução com boa integração e viabilidade dos enxertos e retalhos. O resultado estético foi satisfatório. Conclusão: A utilização de retalho nasogeniano como opção terapêutica para a reconstrução parcial de nariz e de lábio superior apresentou desfechos funcionais/estéticos favoráveis. Além disso, a segmentação do procedimento cirúrgico traz segurança na utilização dos retalhos locais, principalmente em indivíduos de difícil cicatrização.

Background: Obstetrics injuries can be defined as fetal lesions suffered by the fetus during labor or expulsion. Objective: Identify risk factors for fetal birth trauma. Method: Case-control study conducted from July 2004 to December 2005. We analyzed maternal and fetal variables using software SPSS 19.0. The variables showing a significance level <0.10 in the bivariate analysis were included in the logistic regression analysis. We used the block entry model for selection of the final regression model. Results: During these period, we identified 2137 births and 26 (1.2%) were related to fetal birth injury. Clavicle fracture was the most frequent injury (n = 14; 53.8%), followed by cephalohematoma (n = 5; 19.2%). Umbilical cord blood gas analysis did not show statistical significance. In the regression analysis of the variables that had significance level <0.10, the only independent variables associated with fetal birth injury were vaginal delivery (OR-A: 11.08; 95%CI: 2.45-49.98; p=0.002) and thorax circumference > 33 cm (OR-A: 3.36; 95%CI: 1.35-9.73; p=0.010). Conclusion: The risk factors for fetal birth injury were vaginal delivery and chest circumference equal to or larger than 33 cm. Other variables were not associated with the outcome in discussion.

Antecedentes: Se define trauma al nacimiento las lesiones sufridas por el feto durante el trabajo de parto o expulsión. Objetivo: Identificar los factores de riesgo asociados a lesiones originadas durante el nacimiento en recién nacidos. Método: Estudio casos y controles, realizado en el período de julio/2004 a diciembre/2005, en la División de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital General de Caxias do Sul/ Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil. Fueron analizadas variables maternas, del parto y fetales, utilizando el programa estadístico SPSS versión 19.0. Los factores que obtuvieron nivel significativo <0,10 en los análisis bivariado fueron insertas en la regresión logística. Se utilizó el modelo de entrada por bloques (block entry) para selección del modelo final de la regresión. Resultados: En el período citado nacieron 2.137 infantes, 26 de ellos (1,2%) sufrieron trauma al nacimiento. La fractura de clavícula fue la lesión más frecuente (n=14; 53,8%), seguida del cefalohematoma (n=5; 19,2%). Las variables gasométricas no presentaron diferencia estadística. En la regresión logística, las únicas variables independientes asociadas a traumatismo al nacimiento fueron parto vaginal (OR-A: 11,08; IC95%: 2,45-49,98; p=0,002) y perímetro torácico >33 cm (OR-A: 3,36; IC95%: 1,35-9,73; p=0,010). Conclusión: Los factores de riesgo asociados a lesiones durante el nacimiento involucran el parto vaginal y el perímetro torácico igual o superior a 33cm.